Breadcrumb
Intracellular Staining Methods
Abridged from Jacoberger JW, 1991, Intracellular antigen staining: quantitative immunofluorescence. Methods 2:207-218.
Fixation Method | Reagents | Use | Advantages | Problems |
---|---|---|---|---|
Organic Solvent Fixation | EtOH MeOH Acetone |
Long time storage Inactivate cellular processes |
No covalent modification of DNA, RNA, protein, or carbohydrate epitopes Permeabilizes cells |
Not good for lipophilic antigens Cell aggregation |
Formaldehyde Fixation | Paraformaldehyde | Fixation for surface or intracellular staining when followed by lipid solvents | Relatively mild fixative Cell membrane integrity preserved |
Severely broadens DNA histogram peaks when using PI simultaneously with cell surface or intracellular staining |
Detergent Lysis | Triton X-100 Tween 80 NP 40 Saponin |
Rapid permeabilization Native conformation of intracellular antigens Requires fewer washes, preserving limited cell numbers |
Rapid Requires fewer washes |
Cell fragility Loss of cytoplasmic cell components High debris component Limited storage time |
Freeze/Thaw | Freeze/Thaw buffer | Same as detergent lysis | Same as detergent lysis | Same as detergent lysis |
Formaldehyde/Detergent | Paraformaldehyde Triton X-100 |
Primarily used for simultaneous nuclear antigen and DNA content Detection of antigens in all cell compartments at higher formaldehyde concentrations |
Good DNA histogram CV at low formaldehyde concentrations Low debris component Few aggregates |
Loss of loosely bound cellular components Short-term storage |
Formaldehyde/Methanol | Paraformaldehyde MeOH |
Retains antigen within the cell better than alcohol alone | Cells can be stored indefinitely Antigens retained better within cell Low debris component Few aggregates |
DNA histogram CV higher than alcohol alone |